The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2340•United States of America v. Isaac Lee Woods; Regina Bailey Woods; Ella R. Woods
10-2340Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2340
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ISAAC LEE WOODS; REGINA BAILEY WOODS; ELLA R. WOODS,
Defendants – Appellants,
and
UNLIMITED FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-cv-00187-BR)
Submitted: April 4, 2011 Decided: April 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Lee Woods, Regina Bailey Woods, Ella R. Woods, Appellants
Pro Se. S. Katherine Burnette, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Isaac Lee Woods, Regina Bailey Woods and Ella R. Woods
appeal the district court’s order denying their motion filed
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by
the district court. See United States v. Woods, No. 5:07-cv-
00187-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2010). We deny the Woods’ motion
for summary disposition. We also deny the motion for oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.