The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2319•Gary G. Harris v. Tietex International, Limited
10-2319Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2319
GARY G. HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (7:08-cv-03020-JMC)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary G. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Brendan Murphy, Fred W.
Suggs, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary G. Harris appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on his
action brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2010). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Harris v. Tietex Int’l, Ltd., No. 7:08-cv-03020-JMC
(D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.