The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2299•Derek N. Jarvis v. Staples, Incorporated
10-2299Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2299
DEREK N. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STAPLES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00244-PJM)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 2, 2011
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Reenah Kim, SEYFARTH SHAW,
LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action alleging discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis
v. Staples, Inc., No. 8:10-cv-00244-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.