The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2159•Derek N. Jarvis; Shirley J. Pittman v. Grady Management, Incorporated
10-2159Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2159
DEREK N. JARVIS; SHIRLEY J. PITTMAN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GRADY MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED; DUFFIE, INCORPORATED; APRIL
LANE JOINT VENURES; MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT/MONTGOMERY
COUNTY EXECUTIVE; MONTGOMERY COUNTY HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS OFFICE; MONTGOMERY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:09-cv-00280-PJM)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 2, 2011
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis and Shirley J. Pittman, Appellants Pro Se. John
Benjamin Raftery, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Bethesda, Maryland; Edward
Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis and Shirley J. Pittman appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis
v. Grady Mgmt., Inc., No. 8:09-cv-00280-PJM (D. Md. Oct. 6,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.