The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2133•Shirley Stewart; Larry Stewart v. Hsbc Bank USA
10-2133Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2133
SHIRLEY STEWART; LARRY STEWART,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
HSBC BANK USA; MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration
System, Incorporated; DELTA FUNDING CORPORATION, d/b/a
Fidelity Mortgage; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; NECTAR
PROJECTS, INCORPORATED; LAW OFFICES OF SHAPIRO & BRUNSON,
LLP; RENAISSANCE MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00586-RLW)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley Stewart, Larry Stewart, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shirley and Larry Stewart appeal the district court’s
order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure
to comply with Fed. Rules Civ. P. 8 and 9. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. HSBC Bank
USA, No. 3:10-cv-00586-RLW (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.