The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2098•James R. Taccino; Jane E. Taccino v. BANK OF AMERICA, Countrywide Home Loans Assignee
10-2098Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2098
JAMES R. TACCINO; JANE E. TACCINO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, Countrywide Home Loans Assignee; UNION
FIRST MORTGAGE, a/k/a DAV Law Enterprises, broker for
Countrywide,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00316-JFM)
Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James R. Taccino, Jane E. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Glenn
Cline, Charles Scott Hirsch, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland; Marc Ominsky, CHAIFETZ & COYLE, PC, Columbia,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James R. Taccino and Jane E. Taccino appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00316-JFM (D.
Md. Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.