Donna Fox Boldin v. Alison Wingfield; Ceciley Huselin

10-2089Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2089
DONNA FOX BOLDIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALISON WINGFIELD; CECILEY HUSELIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (6:10-cv-00010-nkm-mfu)
Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donna Fox Boldin, Appellant Pro Se. Sherwood Sunderland Day,
DAY & CURRENT LAW OFFICES, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Donna Fox Boldin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Boldin v. Wingfield, No.
6:10-cv-00010-nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.