The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1978•Evelyn L. Middleton v. United States of America; Department of Treasury
10-1978Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 25, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1978
EVELYN L. MIDDLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 25, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evelyn L. Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn Middleton appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2042 (2006) action for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Middleton v. United States, No. 4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va.
Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.