The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1966•Susan Gaddy v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
10-1966Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1966
SUSAN GADDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; BERKSHIRE LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; CONSOLIDATED PLANNING,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:09-cv-00837-HMH)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susan Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Farrar, SMITH, MOORE,
LEATHERWOOD, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina; Forrest Stephen
Latta, BURR & FORMAN, LLP, Mobile, Alabama; Gray Thomas
Culbreath, Robert F. Goings, COLLINS & LACY, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Susan Gaddy appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Gaddy v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., No. 6:09-cv-00837-HMH
(D.S.C. July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.