The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1938•Milton Lewis v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
10-1938Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1938
MILTON LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(1:07-cv-03231-MBS)
Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Mark Kelly, Daniel
Bowman White, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Milton Lewis appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and motion
in limine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Lewis v. Norfolk S. Ry., Inc., No. 1:07-cv-
03231-MBS (D.S.C. July 16, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.