The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1929•Eric H. Bush v. Berkey’s Inc. Ha Ihop
10-1929Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1929
ERIC H. BUSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BERKEY’S INC. HA IHOP,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00154-JBF-DEM)
Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric H. Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Randy Carl Sparks, Jr., FORD &
HARRISON, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric H. Bush appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Title VII action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Bush v. Berkey’s Inc. HA
IHOP, No. 2:10-cv-00154-JBF-DEM (E.D. Va. July 21, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.