The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1901•Joseph Wojcicki v. Aiken Technical College
10-1901Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 21, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1901
JOSEPH WOJCICKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; SUSAN A. WINSOR, ex Graham ATC
president; WILLIAM TILT, Associate Vice President of
Technical Education; THOMAS DESROCHER, Program Coordinator;
LEE POWELL, Human Resources Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(1:06-cv-00461-HFF-PJG)
Submitted: March 2, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Wojcicki, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Boykin, Shunna T.
Vance, BOYKIN & DAVIS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Wojcicki seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny
his motions for default judgment or, in the alternative, for
summary judgment, and denying reconsideration of that order.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541
(1949). The orders Wojcicki seeks to appeal are neither final
orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.