The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1887•Carl Thomas Sturdivant v. Kone Incorporated
10-1887Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 8, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1887
CARL THOMAS STURDIVANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KONE INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District for North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00224-RJC-DSC)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 8, 2011
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Thomas Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Scott Muhich,
DYKEMA GOSSETT, PLLC, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carl Thomas Sturdivant appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action
alleging discrimination in employment and related violations of
state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sturdivant v. Kone Inc., No. 3:09-cv-00224-RJC-
DSC (W.D.N.C. July 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.