The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1879•John Fitzgerald Brown v. Thomas Supply Company, Incorporated
10-1879Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1879
JOHN FITZGERALD BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS SUPPLY COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (2:08-cv-03124-CWH)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Fitzgerald Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Edward Justice,
Jr., Joseph Jakob Kennedy, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY, PA,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Fitzgerald Brown appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in Brown’s
Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Brown v. Thomas Supply Co., Inc., No.
2:08-cv-03124-CWH (D.S.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.