Patricia T. Patterson v. George Funderburk; Susan Barden; David Huffstertler

10-1859Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 7, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1859
PATRICIA T. PATTERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GEORGE FUNDERBURK; SUSAN BARDEN; DAVID HUFFSTERTLER,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (0:10-cv-00676-MBS)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Patterson v. Funderburk, No. 0:10-cv-00676-MBS (D.S.C.
June 10, 2010). We deny Patterson’s motion for default
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.