The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1851•Glenda Falwell v. Kennedy Krieger Institute
10-1851Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1851
GLENDA FALWELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00566-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenda Falwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Glenda Falwell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her emergency motion for return of child and denying
her motion for an extension of time to file proof of legal
custody of the minor child. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Falwell v. Kennedy
Krieger Inst., No. 1:10-cv-00566-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 23,
2010). We deny Falwell’s motion to amend the caption and grant
her motion to amend her informal brief. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.