The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1842•Richard A. Kaminsky v. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Wfubmc
10-1842Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 8, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1842
RICHARD A. KAMINSKY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, WFUBMC;
DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY; A.J. GARVIN, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman,
Pathology,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-00882-JAB-PTS)
Submitted: December 30, 2010 Decided: February 8, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard A. Kaminsky, Appellant Pro Se. William J. McMahon, IV,
Kristine Marie Sims, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Kaminsky appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing
his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Kaminsky v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist
Med. Ctr., WFUBMC, No. 1:08-cv-00882-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. July 19,
2010). We deny as moot Kaminsky’s motion to expedite. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.