The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1825•Carolyn De Guzman v. Nih Federal Credit Union
10-1825Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1825
CAROLYN DE GUZMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NIH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:08-cv-03213-PJM)
Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn de Guzman, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey William Larroca,
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn de Guzman appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on her
employment discrimination and retaliation claims. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Guzman v. NIH Fed. Credit Union, No. 8:08-cv-03213-PJM (D. Md.
July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.