The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1823•Bridget Tabi Bisong v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
10-1823Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1823
BRIDGET TABI BISONG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: March 17, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,
Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General,
Lyle D. Jentzer, Senior Litigation Counsel, Charles S. Greene,
III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bridget Tabi Bisong, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider. We
have reviewed the administrative record and Bisong’s contentions
and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in
denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010). We
accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. See In re: Bisong (B.I.A. June 21, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.