The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1804•CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC, d/b/a Charter Communications v. Melvin Eleazer; Mne Broadcasting, LLC
10-1804Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 9, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1804
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC, d/b/a Charter
Communications; INTERLINK COMMUNICATIONS PARTNERS, LLC,
d/b/a Charter Communications,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
MELVIN ELEAZER; MNE BROADCASTING, LLC,
Defendants – Appellants,
and
WDRL-TV, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (5:04-cv-01204)
Submitted: August 31, 2011 Decided: September 9, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne L. Evans, KATZ, KANTOR & PERKINS, Bluefield, West
Virginia, for Appellants. Adam S. Caldwell, DAVIS WRIGHT
TREMAINE LLP, Washington, D.C.; J. Miles Morgan, ECKERT,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Eleazer and MNE Broadcasting, LLC, appeal from
the district court’s orders denying their motion to set aside a
default judgment and their motion for a continuance in the
underlying civil action. We have reviewed the record included
on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in
the district court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Charter Commc’ns VI,
LLC v. Eleazer, No. 5:04-cv-01204 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 8, 2009;
June 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.