The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1793•Virgil H. Sutherland v. Commissioner of Social Security
10-1793Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1793
VIRGIL H. SUTHERLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00541-MR)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Virgil H. Sutherland, Appellant Pro Se. Rami M. Vanegas, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Virgil H. Sutherland appeals the district court’s
order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment,
and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny
Sutherland disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Sutherland v. Comm’r
of Soc. Sec., No. 1:08-cv-00541-MR (W.D.N.C. June 28, 2010). We
grant Sutherland leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.