The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1782•Dale E. Findley v. Volvo Powertrain North America
10-1782Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1782
DALE E. FINDLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VOLVO POWERTRAIN NORTH AMERICA; VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA;
VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA; MACK TRUCKS, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:08-cv-03509-JFM)
Submitted: May 11, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven M. Spiegel, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.
Suzzanne W. Decker, John M. Gilman, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dale E. Findley appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment and awarding costs in favor of his
former employer, Mack Trucks. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Findley v. Volvo
Powertrain N. Am., No. 1:08-cv-03509-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 6, 2010;
July 1, 2010). We grant Findley’s motion to supplement the
record pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.