The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1745•Launeil Sanders v. GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA, State of
10-1745Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1745
LAUNEIL SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA, State of,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00199-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Launeil Sanders appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v.
Gaston County, No. 3:10-cv-00199-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. June 24,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.