Michael D. Darocha v. CITY OF SALEM GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Traffic Division

10-1705Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 1, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1705
MICHAEL D. DAROCHA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SALEM GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Traffic Division,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00218-gec)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Darocha, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Darocha appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim on
which relief may be granted. On appeal, we confine our review
to issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Darocha’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Darocha has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly,
we deny Darocha’s motion to expedite and we affirm the judgment
of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.