The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1703•Michael D. Darocha v. ROANOKE COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Traffic Division
10-1703Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 1, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1703
MICHAEL D. DAROCHA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROANOKE COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Traffic Division,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00217-gec)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Darocha, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Darocha appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim on
which relief may be granted. On appeal, we confine our review
to issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Darocha’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Darocha has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly,
we deny Darocha’s motion to expedite and affirm the judgment of
the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.