Full text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1660
WILLIAM EARL SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OPRAH WINFREY,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: August 18, 2010 Decided: September 9, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Earl Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Earl Smith appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(h)(3) for want of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Winfrey, No.
2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. May 18, 2010). The motion to
seal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
