The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1623•Samuel G. Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc.; Paramount; Viacom
10-1623Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 1, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1623
SAMUEL G. BAILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC.; PARAMOUNT; VIACOM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00787-JRS)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel G. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. John B. O’Keefe, LEVINE
SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel G. Bailey appeals the district court’s order
denying his copyright complaint against Black Entertainment
Television, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bailey v. Black Entm’t Television, Inc.,
No. 3:009-cv-00787-JRS (E.D. Va. May 3, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.