Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santanna v. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor (first Representative of Maryland)

10-1621Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1621
RODRIGUEZ SAMUEL DA MATHA DE SANTANNA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor (first Representative of
Maryland); GLENN IVEY, State’s Attorney (first Public
Prosecutor of PG County); BRIAN LOFTON, Commissioner
(ID#5138),
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STATE OF MARYLAND, In care of Governor O’Malley,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv—01927-AW)
Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santana, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn
William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santana appeals the
district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to
dismiss in this civil rights action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. De Matha De
Santana v. O’Malley, No. 8:09-cv-01927-AW (D. Md. filed
May 21, 2010 & entered May 24, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.