The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1585•Michael J. Sindram v. City of Takoma Park Police Department; K. Gilbert; Mr. Wolff, 8352; Terry Johnsson
10-1585Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1585
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF TAKOMA PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT; K. GILBERT; MR.
WOLFF, #8352; TERRY JOHNSSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00681-PJM)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Sindram appeals a district court order
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Sindram v. City of Takoma
Park Police, No. 8:10-cv-00681-PJM (D. Md. filed Apr. 26, 2010;
entered Apr. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.