The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1580•Francis Akinro v. Baltimore U.s. Post Office Policemen
10-1580Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 30, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1580
FRANCIS AKINRO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE U.S. POST OFFICE POLICEMEN, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01151-JFM)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Baltimore U.S.
Post Office Policemen, No. 1:10-cv-01151-JFM (D. Md. May 14,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.