The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1542•Amos Vaughn v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
10-1542Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 15, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1542
AMOS VAUGHN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. David W. Daniel,
Magistrate Judge. (2:09-cv-00028-DAN)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amos Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mary Ellen
Russell, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Amos Vaughn appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in this
action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits
and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Astrue, No.
2:09-cv-00028-DAN (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2010). We deny the motion to
appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.