The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1510•Judy Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency
10-1510Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 4, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1510
JUDY HARRISON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; FBI; CHICAGO FBI-DIVISIONS;
WASHINGTON FBI-DIVISIONS; VIRGINIA FBI-DIVISIONS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00163-JRS)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judy Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Judy Harrison appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency,
No. 3:10-cv-00163-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2010). We deny
Harrison’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.