The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1434•JOSEPH N. CALLAWAY, Trustee v. Kiddco, Incorporated
10-1434Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 1, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1434
JOSEPH N. CALLAWAY, Trustee,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
KIDDCO, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-cv-00262-F; 04—03490-5-JRL; 06-00028-5-
AP)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: February 1, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nelson G. Harris, HARRIS & HILTON, P.A., Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant. A. Scott McKellar, BATTLE, WINSLOW,
SCOTT & WILEY, P.A., Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kiddco, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order
upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that the payment
of $55,625.27 from the debtor in bankruptcy to Kiddco amounted
to an avoidable preference under 11 U.S.C.A. § 547 (West 2004 &
Supp. 2010). Our review of the record and the briefs filed by
the parties discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Callaway v.
Kiddco, Inc., Nos. 5:07-cv-00262-F; 04-03490-5-JRL; 06-00028-5-
AP (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.