The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1415•Joseph M. Russell v. Commonwealth of Virginia
10-1415Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1415
JOSEPH M. RUSSELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III; D. ARTHUR
KELSEY; WILLIAM G. PETTY; M. LANGHORNE KEITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (4:09-cv-00029-JBF-DEM)
Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Monolo, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph M. Russell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Russell v. Virginia, No. 4:09-cv-00029-JBF-DEM (E.D. Va.
March 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.