The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1400•Debra I. Robertson v. Cree, Incorporated
10-1400Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1400
DEBRA I. ROBERTSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CREE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00189-H)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Debra I. Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard D. Haygood,
KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Debra I. Robertson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint alleging retaliation and race, gender,
and age discrimination for failing to state a claim on which
relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Robertson v. Cree, Inc., No.
5:09-cv-00189-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.