The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1385•Joe E. Teague, Jr. v. Ncdot
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1385
JOE E. TEAGUE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NCDOT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-cv-00045-F)
Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe E. Teague, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ebony Jeanelle Pittman,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joe Edwards Teague, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his motion seeking to re-open the
appeal period in the underlying civil action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Teague v. NCDOT,
No. 5:07-cv-00045-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009; Mar. 8, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.