In re: Darrell Lamont Bostick

10-1381Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1381
In Re: DARRELL LAMONT BOSTICK,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:05-cr-00200-WLO)
Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell Lamont Bostick, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Darrell Lamont Bostick petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. Our review of the
district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied
Bostick’s motion on April 8, 2010. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently decided Bostick’s case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.