The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1363•In re: Wendy B. Dauberman
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1363
In Re: WENDY B. DAUBERMAN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:07-cr-00040-HEH-2)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wendy B. Dauberman, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wendy B. Dauberman petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on her 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. She seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act. Our review
of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court
has denied Dauberman’s § 2255 motion, without prejudice.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.