The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1273•ESTATE OF MARY V. ALLISON, Donor, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
10-1273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1273
ESTATE OF MARY V. ALLISON, Donor, Deceased; DANIEL B.
ALLISON, II, former attorney of record for the Estate of
Mary V. Allison, Donor, Deceased,
Petitioners – Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
(Tax Ct. Nos. 00-247; 00-714)
Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel B. Allison, II, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Clarence Pett,
Bruce R. Ellisen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel B. Allison, II, individually and as the
administrator of the Estate of Mary V. Allison, appeals from the
tax court’s orders imposing sanctions on him and upholding the
Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in the estate’s
gift tax. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax
court. Estate of Mary V. Allison v. Comm’r of IRS, Nos. 00-247;
00-714 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 12, 2009 & Dec. 1, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.