The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1243•Robert Afari Minta v. Fedex Ground Package System, Incorporated
10-1243Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 12, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1243
ROBERT AFARI MINTA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-
cv-02286-RWT)
Submitted: October 21, 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Afari Minta, Appellant Pro Se. Robert G. Ames, Lesley
Pate Marlin, VENABLE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Afari Minta appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to remand and granting Defendant’s motion to
dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on Minta’s
claims for non-payment of wages, punitive damages, breach of
contract and specific performance. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Minta v. FedEx Ground Package Sys.,
Inc., No. 8:09-cv-02286-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 2, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.