The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1187•Anna M. Clayton v. James Dickens; Jemko Transport, Incorporated
10-1187Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1187
ANNA M. CLAYTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES DICKENS; JEMKO TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
C&M FORWARDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District
Judge. (7:08-cv-00592-gec-mfu)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anna M. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. David Wayne Hearn, SANDS
ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anna M. Clayton appeals the district court’s order
entering judgment for the Defendants on Clayton’s diversity
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Clayton’s motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm the judgment of the district court.
Clayton v. Dickens, No. 7:08-cv-00592-gec-mfu (E.D. Va. Jan. 27,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.