The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1110•Ferenc K. Csabai v. Martek Biosciences Corporation
10-1110Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 24, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1110
FERENC K. CSABAI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION; HENRY LINSERT, JR.;
RICHARD J. RADMER; THOMAS C. FISHER; JEROME C. KELLER;
PETER L. BUZY; GEORGE P. BARKER; JULES BLAKE; ANN L.
JOHNSON; DOUGLAS J. MACMASTER; JOHN H. MAHAR; SANDRA PANEM;
EUGENE H. ROTHERG; WILLIAM D. SMART; JAMES FLATT; ROBERT J.
FLANAGAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-02280-CCB)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ferenc K. Csabai, Appellant Pro Se. Mark D. Gately, Scott R.
Haiber, Andrea William Trento, HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ferenc K. Csabai appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Csabai v. Martek
Biosciences Corp., No. 1:09-cv-02280-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 23, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.