The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1094•David J. Washington v. LOUIS HARRELSON; RICHARD’S TIRE; KENNY DAVIS, Chief; JAMES A. COX, Honorable
10-1094Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1094
DAVID J. WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOUIS HARRELSON; RICHARD’S TIRE; KENNY DAVIS, Chief; JAMES
A. COX, Honorable,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:09-cv-02745-RBH)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David J. Washington appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v.
Harrelson, No. 4:09-cv-02745-RBH (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2010). We also
deny Washington’s motions for an evidentiary hearing and
judgment, and hearing to be heard in open court. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.