The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1069•Andrew Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
10-1069Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 19, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1069
ANDREW STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate
Judge. (9:08-cv-03600-BM)
Submitted: July 23, 2010 Decided: August 19, 2010
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Kristi Denney, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado; Beth Drake, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Stewart appeals the judgment entered by the
district court affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny a
period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and
supplemental social security income.∗
AFFIRMED
We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Stewart v.
Astrue, No. 9:08-cv-03600-BM (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
∗ The parties consented to the exercise of the district
court’s jurisdiction by a magistrate judge, as permitted by 28
U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.