The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1054•Chander Kant; Ashima K. Kant v. Jay L. Cohen
10-1054Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1054
CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
JAY L. COHEN,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08-
cv-00318-RWT)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Deborah
Murrell Whelihan, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district
court’s orders granting the Defendant’s motion for summary
judgment and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Kant v. Cohen, No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT (D. Md. Dec. 11, 2009; Oct.
14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.