Victor B. White v. Fnu Taylor; Fnu Moss; Fnu Sergeant; Fnu Smith; Fnu Paulk; Fnu Childs; Fnu Trimmer

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1014
VICTOR B. WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FNU TAYLOR; FNU MOSS; FNU SERGEANT; FNU SMITH; FNU PAULK;
FNU CHILDS; FNU TRIMMER,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
FNU SMEREKA; CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00257-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: February 22, 2010 Decided: March 9, 2010
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor B. White, Appellant Pro Se. David John Adinolfi, II,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sean
Francis Perrin, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Victor B. White seeks to appeal the district court’s
text orders dismissing some, but not all defendants, and denying
reconsideration in this civil rights action. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders White seeks
to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory
or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --