The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8267•Frank Reaves v. Helen Fahey, et al., Chairman, V.P.B.
09-8267Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 5, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8267
FRANK REAVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HELEN FAHEY, et al., Chairman, V.P.B.; JOHN DOE, June 20,
2002, Community Release Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00572-HCM-TEM)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank Reaves, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frank Reaves appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claim pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Reaves v. Fahey, No.
2:09-cv-00572-HCM-TEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.