The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8226•Eugene Ernst Jackson v. United States of America
09-8226Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 7, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8226
EUGENE ERNST JACKSON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:09-cv-02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Ernst Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Leotta,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Ernst Jackson appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for Writ of Audita Querela pursuant to
the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. United
States, Nos. 1:09-cv-02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN (D. Md.
Oct. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.