The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8133•Eunice Husband v. Brian Joseph Kornbrath; Federal Public Defender Office
09-8133Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 25, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8133
EUNICE HUSBAND,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRIAN JOSEPH KORNBRATH; FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00098-JRG-JES)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 25, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eunice Husband, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eunice Husband appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971) for failure to pay a partial filing fee. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Husband v. Kornbrath, No. 5:09-cv-00098-JRG-JES (N.D.W.
Va. Nov. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.