The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-8099•United States of America v. Tony Dewayne McQueen
09-8099Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8099
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TONY DEWAYNE MCQUEEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00269-JAB)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony Dewayne McQueen, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tony Dewayne McQueen appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in denying the
motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th
Cir. 2004) (standard). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. McQueen, No. 1:03-cr-
00269-JAB (M.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.